I am sure
the American War of Independence was depicted in our British history books in a
very different light from that in which it was reported to American pupils in
theirs.
Whatever the different opinions, the outcome of this war was the same - the eventual emergence of the independent United States of America.
One might say this was the most important war Americans ever fought, and yet in literature it has been overshadowed by the numerous volumes dealing with the Civil War, America's bloodiest war. I know so little about either.
'Time to find out a bit more than the bare bones I recall' I thought. So I've recently finished reading 'Through A Howling Wilderness', by Thomas A. Desjardin. This is an account of Benedict Arnold's campaign to lead an army through the wilds of Maine towards Québec City, and enlist the disgruntled French residents in overthrowing the British in Québec and eventually all Canada. Though the book is written for adults, I'd recommend it for reading by a literate middle grade history buff - and there are many of those.
Yet, they had come so close to success.
Desjardin's work leads me to believe Benedict Arnold was one of the ablest commanders ever to lead an American force. So why is he portrayed in American history books as a traitor? Here is an ideal opportunity for teachers to start a junior debating club over his reasons for decamping to London; once a reader learns why Colonel Arnold made the decision he did, then he may form an opinion on whether or not that decision was justified.
Whatever the different opinions, the outcome of this war was the same - the eventual emergence of the independent United States of America.
One might say this was the most important war Americans ever fought, and yet in literature it has been overshadowed by the numerous volumes dealing with the Civil War, America's bloodiest war. I know so little about either.
'Time to find out a bit more than the bare bones I recall' I thought. So I've recently finished reading 'Through A Howling Wilderness', by Thomas A. Desjardin. This is an account of Benedict Arnold's campaign to lead an army through the wilds of Maine towards Québec City, and enlist the disgruntled French residents in overthrowing the British in Québec and eventually all Canada. Though the book is written for adults, I'd recommend it for reading by a literate middle grade history buff - and there are many of those.
We now live in the province of Québec, and last year drove
from north of Montréal to Bar Harbor, Maine. Once we had left the
corrugated streets of Montréal behind, we travelled mile after mile of smooth
blacktop, our only view on either side nothing but tall trees or massive
cliffs. As our car climbed and descended
the long, steep hills it was easy to imagine the struggles faced by that
motley crew of not so long ago.
No modern highway eased their path. Instead the army of men following Benedict
Arnold’s push to Québec City had to fight their way through the dense
undergrowth, relying on the accuracy of their scouts and native pathways to
lead them to their goal. They faced miserable rain, deep snow, and fierce cold
in winter. Summer was plagued by mosquitoes black flies, and humid heat.
Hunger was a constant, whether from lost or spoiled provisions or barren
surroundings. Attacks from some native,
tribes, drunkenness, deserters, and various other misfortunes dogged the
expedition. In the end, despite their
determination, they failed to capture Québec City.
Yet, they had come so close to success.
Desjardin's work leads me to believe Benedict Arnold was one of the ablest commanders ever to lead an American force. So why is he portrayed in American history books as a traitor? Here is an ideal opportunity for teachers to start a junior debating club over his reasons for decamping to London; once a reader learns why Colonel Arnold made the decision he did, then he may form an opinion on whether or not that decision was justified.
Dejardin’s work focuses entirely on the viewpoint of those Americans
who were bent on independence. By contrast, in 'Johnny Tremain' Esther
Forbes tries to show the reasoning of both those who wanted independence, and
the loyalists.
A realistic, entertaining historical fiction story for middle graders, with a little personal mystery and romance for Johnny thrown in, it is a lighter book, and will appeal more to younger readers.
A realistic, entertaining historical fiction story for middle graders, with a little personal mystery and romance for Johnny thrown in, it is a lighter book, and will appeal more to younger readers.
Either of these books could make excellent material for
teachers to encourage a lively classroom
discussion on the emergence of the United States of America, with any number of
essay possibilities arising. Towards the end of term, as the long summer
vacation approaches, it would be fun to combine history with drama and stage a
re-enactment of one of the battles. With
due caution on teacher’s part J.
Different viewpoints are certainly needed in the study of history. Willa Cather, author of Death Comes to the Archbishop, changed the name of a real priest in 1830s-1850s New Mexico in her historical novel, and vilified him. But Padre Jose Antonio Martinez baptized my great-grandmother; schooled a great-great-great grand uncle who became a priest; established a law school; published a newspaper; and stood up for the local New Mexicans whose culture was being put down by the French archbishop, Lamy. What do you think my viewpoint is of the local priest?
ReplyDeleteYou gotta love him - knowing you, what else can I think? I'm busy putting a comment after your latest blog entry.
DeleteHave you read Kenneth Robert's historical fiction (adult) about Benedict Arnold? There are two books, Arundel, and Rebels in Arms. Roberts did a wonderful job showing Arnold's strengths and weaknesses.
ReplyDeleteDeb Watley
www.debwatley.com
No, I haven't read those books, Debbie. Thanks for putting me on to them.
DeleteElizabeth